Help Wanted and Good First Issue Labels

Provides guidance on how and when to use the help wanted and good first issue labels. These are used to identify issues that have been specially groomed for new contributors.


We use two labels help wanted and good first issue to identify issues that have been specially groomed for new contributors. The good first issue label is a subset of help wanted label, indicating that members have committed to providing extra assistance for new contributors. All good first issue items also have the help wanted label.

We also have some suggestions for using these labels to help grow and improve our community.

Help Wanted

Items marked with the help wanted label need to ensure that they are:

  • Low Barrier to Entry

    It should be tractable for new contributors. Documentation on how that type of change should be made should already exist.

  • Clear Task

    The task is agreed upon and does not require further discussions in the community. Call out if that area of code is untested and requires new fixtures.

    API / CLI behavior is decided and included in the OP issue, for example: “The new command syntax is svcat unbind NAME [--orphan] [--timeout 5m], with expected validations called out.

  • Goldilocks priority

    Not too high that a core contributor should do it, but not too low that it isn’t useful enough for a core contributor to spend time to review it, answer questions, help get it into a release, etc.

  • Up-To-Date

    Often these issues become obsolete and have already been done, are no longer desired, no longer make sense, have changed priority or difficulty , etc.

Related commands:

  • /help : Adds the help wanted label to an issue.
  • /remove-help : Removes the help wanted label from an issue. If the good first issue label is present, it is removed as well.

Good First Issue

Items marked with the good first issue label are intended for first-time contributors. It indicates that members will keep an eye out for these pull requests and shepherd it through our processes.

New contributors should not be left to find an approver, ping for reviews, decipher prow commands, or identify that their build failed due to a flake. This makes new contributors feel welcome, valued, and assures them that they will have an extra level of help with their first contribution.

After a contributor has successfully completed 1-2 good first issue's, they should be ready to move on to help wanted items, saving remaining good first issue's for other new contributors.

These items need to ensure that they follow the guidelines for help wanted labels (above) in addition to meeting the following criteria:

  • No Barrier to Entry

    The task is something that a new contributor can tackle without advanced setup, or domain knowledge.

  • Solution Explained

    The recommended solution is clearly described in the issue.

  • Provides Context

    If background knowledge is required, this should be explicitly mentioned and a list of suggested readings included.

  • Gives Examples

    Link to examples of similar implementations so new contributors have a reference guide for their changes.

  • Identifies Relevant Code

    The relevant code and tests to be changed should be linked in the issue.

  • Ready to Test

    There should be existing tests that can be modified, or existing test cases fit to be copied. If the area of code doesn’t have tests, before labeling the issue, add a test fixture. This prep often makes a great help wanted task!

Related commands:

  • /good-first-issue : Adds the good first issue label to an issue. Also adds the help wanted label, if not already present.
  • /remove-good-first-issue : Removes the good first issue label from an issue.


We encourage our more experienced members to help new contributors, so that the Kubernetes community can continue to grow and maintain the kind, inclusive community that we all enjoy today.

The following suggestions go a long way toward preventing “drive-by” PRs, and ensure that our investment in new contributors is rewarded by them coming back and becoming regulars.

Provide extra assistance during reviews on good first issue pull requests:

  • Answer questions and identify useful docs.
  • Offer advice such as “One way to reproduce this in a cluster is to do X and then you can use kubectl to poke around”, or “Did you know that you can use fake clients to setup and test this easier?".
  • Help new contributors learn enough about the project, setting up their environment, running tests, and navigating this area of the code so that they can tackle a related help wanted issue next time.

If you make someone feel like a part of our community, that it’s safe to ask questions, that people will let them know the rules/norms, that their contributions are helpful and appreciated… they will stick around! 🌈

  • Encourage new contributors to seek help on the appropriate slack channels, introduce them, and include them in your conversations.
  • Invite them to the SIG meetings.
  • Give credit to new contributors so that others get to know them, “Hey, would someone help give a second LGTM on @newperson’s first PR on chocolate bunnies?". Mention them in the SIG channel/meeting, thank them on twitter or #shoutouts.
  • Use all the emoji in your approve or lgtm comment. 💖 🚀
  • Let them know that their good first issue is getting extra attention to make the first one easier and help them find a follow-up issue.
  • Suggest a related help wanted so that can build up experience in an area.
  • People are more likely to continue contributing when they know what to expect, what’s the acceptable way to ask for people to review a PR, nudge things along when a PR is stalled. Show them how we operate by helping move their first PR along.
  • If you have time, let the contributor know that they can DM you with questions that they aren’t yet comfortable asking the wider group.